imtoken will never ask for your seed phrase, private key or verification code. Always review the address, network and request details before transferring, signing or approving.
Home/Phishing & Scams

Security guide

Phishing & Scams

Phishing sites often use look-alike domains, search ads, social messages, and fake support to create urgency, with the goal of stealing recovery secrets or inducing malicious signatures.

01

Core security principles

Phishing sites often use look-alike domains, search ads, social messages, and fake support to create urgency, with the goal of stealing recovery secrets or inducing malicious signatures. When working with Phishing & Scams, separate what the interface displays from facts that can be verified on-chain. A wallet can organize information and prepare requests, but the network, address, contract, and final transaction state still need independent context. If a critical field cannot be explained, stop before confirming and verify it again instead of responding to urgency from a page, an unknown contact, or short-term market movement.

Fake airdrops and refunds often ask users to connect a wallet or pay a small fee first; unfamiliar assets and links should not become more trustworthy because they are described as free or time-limited. In a real workflow, Phishing & Scams should not be reduced to a single click or one status message. Review the network, account, requested action, amount, and permission scope as separate checkpoints so inconsistencies become visible earlier. If a critical field cannot be explained, stop before confirming and verify it again instead of responding to urgency from a page, an unknown contact, or short-term market movement.

Key fields

  • Confirm that the network, address, or contract involved in Phishing & Scams matches the intended context
  • Use public information for verification and never submit a seed phrase, private key, or verification code
  • Treat signatures, approvals, transfers, and contract calls as separate decisions rather than permanent trust
Practical checkIdentify the object first, then the action, then the expected result.
02

Common risk scenarios

Fake airdrops and refunds often ask users to connect a wallet or pay a small fee first; unfamiliar assets and links should not become more trustworthy because they are described as free or time-limited. In a real workflow, Phishing & Scams should not be reduced to a single click or one status message. Review the network, account, requested action, amount, and permission scope as separate checkpoints so inconsistencies become visible earlier. If a critical field cannot be explained, stop before confirming and verify it again instead of responding to urgency from a page, an unknown contact, or short-term market movement.

If something appears suspicious, stop interacting, preserve evidence such as the domain and transaction hash, and verify through an independent source instead of following the same contact’s instructions. Risk often hides inside familiar-looking details. Similar names, addresses, domains, and repeated confirmation dialogs can make a request feel routine even when the underlying target or authority is different. If a critical field cannot be explained, stop before confirming and verify it again instead of responding to urgency from a page, an unknown contact, or short-term market movement.

Order of operations

  • Confirm that the network, address, or contract involved in Phishing & Scams matches the intended context
  • Use public information for verification and never submit a seed phrase, private key, or verification code
  • Treat signatures, approvals, transfers, and contract calls as separate decisions rather than permanent trust
Practical checkBefore transferring, verify address, network, and amount; before signing, read the request.
03

Recognition and response

If something appears suspicious, stop interacting, preserve evidence such as the domain and transaction hash, and verify through an independent source instead of following the same contact’s instructions. Risk often hides inside familiar-looking details. Similar names, addresses, domains, and repeated confirmation dialogs can make a request feel routine even when the underlying target or authority is different. If a critical field cannot be explained, stop before confirming and verify it again instead of responding to urgency from a page, an unknown contact, or short-term market movement.

Phishing sites often use look-alike domains, search ads, social messages, and fake support to create urgency, with the goal of stealing recovery secrets or inducing malicious signatures. After a Phishing & Scams action, review the final state and retain non-secret reference information such as the transaction hash, network name, or contract address when relevant so later verification is possible. If a critical field cannot be explained, stop before confirming and verify it again instead of responding to urgency from a page, an unknown contact, or short-term market movement.

Risk signals

  • Confirm that the network, address, or contract involved in Phishing & Scams matches the intended context
  • Use public information for verification and never submit a seed phrase, private key, or verification code
  • Treat signatures, approvals, transfers, and contract calls as separate decisions rather than permanent trust
Practical checkThird-party DApps and smart contracts can introduce risk, so stop and re-check unfamiliar requests.
04

Long-term security habits

Phishing sites often use look-alike domains, search ads, social messages, and fake support to create urgency, with the goal of stealing recovery secrets or inducing malicious signatures. After a Phishing & Scams action, review the final state and retain non-secret reference information such as the transaction hash, network name, or contract address when relevant so later verification is possible. If a critical field cannot be explained, stop before confirming and verify it again instead of responding to urgency from a page, an unknown contact, or short-term market movement.

Fake airdrops and refunds often ask users to connect a wallet or pay a small fee first; unfamiliar assets and links should not become more trustworthy because they are described as free or time-limited. When working with Phishing & Scams, separate what the interface displays from facts that can be verified on-chain. A wallet can organize information and prepare requests, but the network, address, contract, and final transaction state still need independent context. If a critical field cannot be explained, stop before confirming and verify it again instead of responding to urgency from a page, an unknown contact, or short-term market movement.

Post-action review

  • Confirm that the network, address, or contract involved in Phishing & Scams matches the intended context
  • Use public information for verification and never submit a seed phrase, private key, or verification code
  • Treat signatures, approvals, transfers, and contract calls as separate decisions rather than permanent trust
Practical checkKeep public references such as transaction hashes and review connections or approvals that are no longer needed.

imtoken

Keep the network, request, and expected result visible

Review the details before transferring, signing, approving, or interacting with a contract.

Download imtoken